Any information you share with Fluxys Belgium through this questionnaire RFI will be treated as confidential in accordance with the non-disclosure agreement (NDA) and, if such information includes personal data, in accordance with the applicable data protection legislation (including the General Data Protection Regulation 2016/679).
If you wish to formalize this commitment, please fill in, sign and send back the NDA to our mailbox info.hydrogen-carbon-transport@fluxys.com
Our questionnaire has 2 sections:
For each section, we invite you to specify the sites (location) and key figures (volumes, timing) for which you have or foresee any H2/CO2 related activities.
All shared information is deemed non-binding and for information purpose only.
Please feel free to skip any questions you cannot or do not want to answer. Any information will help us to develop efficiently and optimally the transmission infrastructure that would benefit to your activities.
Please do not hesitate to contact us at info.hydrogen-carbon-transport@fluxys.com
We like to keep in touch. Therefore, and if you agree, please provide your contact details.
What is your main industrial sector (energy, minerals, chemicals, mobility, etc.)?
1. Do you or intend to produce and/or market hydrogen?*
2. What are your production modes or the modes that you consider?
3. Do you purchase or intend to purchase hydrogen? *
4. What is the current and or future role(s) of hydrogen in your processes?
5. For each of your industrial sites where you consider the production or the offtake of H2, please provide the yearly H2 volumes and/or design capacity of the installation?
This is the most important data of this survey as it covers the Where? When? How much? which allows us to map geographically, quantitatively and over time the necessity of infrastructure.
Steel factory XX, 2000 t/y - 5 t/h - as from 2025-2035. Upscale to 4000 t/y - 15 t/h - after 2035. Phase 1 in feasibility study, phase 2 idea.
Electrolyser plant YY, 45 MW - as from 2026. Upscale to 150 MW - after 2040. Phase 1 in FEED, phase 2 idea.
6. Is the hydrogen specification proposal compatible with your process capabilities?
In order to catalyse the H2 developments and ensure interoperability and compatibility, a hydrogen specification proposal have been drafted taking into account feedback from the market received in the framework of the Request For Information and aligned with the specifications as published by Easee-Gas (CBP H2), available on our website.
7. What are, in order of importance, the critical parameters (listed or missing) within the quality specification or the operating conditions for which compatibility with your processes is not ensured? Please provide a short explanation and the value range compatible with your processes for each critical parameter from the quality specification or the operating conditions.
8. Indicatively, what should the CO2 emission price be to make hydrogen competitive option?
9. What would be the longest contract period for transmission capacity you could commit to?
10. Which key elements are important for the commercial model (third party access, tariff transparency, entry exit, etc.)?
11. How do you consider flexibility? Would you be willing / able to adapt your production for balancing purposes?
1. Do you intend to capture CO2 and do you need access to transmission infrastructure to move it to sequestration or usage sites?*
2. What are your CO2 emission sources?
3. Do you intend to use or to process CO2 from third party sources ?*
4. For which purpose do you intend to offtake CO2 from the network?
5. For each of your industrial sites where you consider the capture of CO2, please provide the yearly CO2 volumes and/or design capacity of the installation?
This is the most important data of this survey as it covers the Where? When? How much? which allows us to map geographically, quantitatively and over time the necessity of infrastructure.
Cement plant XX, 2000 kt/y - 300 t/h - as from 2025-2035. Upscale to 4000 kt/y - 600 t/h - after 2035. Phase 1 in FEED, phase 2 idea.
Greenhouse YY, 5 ktpa - as from 2026. Upscale to 10 ktpa- after 2040. Phase 1 in feasibility study, phase 2 idea.
6. Is the carbon specification proposal compatible with your processes capabilities?
In order to catalyse the CO2 developments and ensure interoperability and compatibility, a CO2 specification proposal have been drafted taking into account feedback from the market received in the framework of the Request For Information and aligned with published specifications of carbon storage sites, available on our website.
7. What are, in order of importance, the critical parameters (listed or missing) within the quality specification or the operating conditions for which compatibility with your processes is not ensured? Please provide a short explanation and the value range compatible with your processes for each critical parameter within the quality specification or the operating conditions.
8. Indicatively, what should the CO2 price be to enable capture of CO2 emissions?
9. What would be the longest contract period for transmission capacity you could commit to?
10. Which key elements are important for the commercial model?
11. How do you conceive flexibility? Would you be willing / able to adapt your injection rate for balancing purposes?
Do you have additional comments or information that may be of interest for the development of the transmission infrastructure? Please feel free to let us know.
Thank you for your participation. Don't forget to click on "Submit" down the page.